Open Access Archives - Page 8 of 8 - Medical Affairs Professional Society

Why Good Science is Good Business: A Conversation with Murali Gopal, MD

October 15, 2020/in Competency, Strategy, Overview & Vision, ACCESS, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Content Hub, Content HUB Featured, Leadership & Management Skills, SEARCH BY TOPIC, SEARCH BY TYPE, Medical Strategy & Launch Excellence/by Medical Affairs

Murali Gopal, MD, Vice President | Global Medical Department at Mallinckrodt

Murali Gopal, MD, remembers being a young clinician in the bygone era of giveaways during conference meetings when he would walk by pharma booths and pick up a water bottle or a tie or whatever they may be giving away. Would he ever wear the tie or use the water bottle? Probably not. But it cost him nothing and so why not? Now Murali compares this might-as-well approach to the biopharmaceutical industry’s traditional (and increasingly outdated) model of brand planning. As Vice President of the Global Medical Department at Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, he is helping his organization evolve into a future that includes the contributions of science and business to attain the goal of innovation. Here the Medical Affairs Professional Society (MAPS) talks with Murali about the strategy he uses to guide this change – Integrated Brand Planning – which he not only credits with bridging the gap between science and business in biopharmaceutical organizations, but sees as a philosophy that has led to his personal development as a leader and decision-maker.

MAPS: Okay, you have to start by telling us how brand planning is like stocking up on conference giveaways.

Murali: Think about what happens when Medical Affairs comes over and says we can generate X, Y and Z data for an asset – if you’re a Commercial person and you’re trying to maximize the opportunity of the molecule, and have no financial downside or obligation…why wouldn’t you take all options? It’s the same mentality as conference swag: If you can get something for nothing, you do it. That may have worked well without today’s challenges. But now companies that still use this model place themselves at a disadvantage.

MAPS: You’re saying this model of saying yes to all possibilities for a new drug leads to inefficiencies?

Murali: Yes, I am saying that, and that it also leads to increased costs and the need for increased resources. At a previous position, we ended up with 7,000 different promotional materials for one molecule in one year. Some were used once and some just sat in warehouses. A handful of them would be the key materials that were used over and over. It was as if we were creating things for the sake of creating things and not focusing on what the external stakeholder may have felt was most compelling or intriguing. Another example can be that perhaps the organization may determine they need some data without fully understanding that it may take five years to conclude a particular study, or may cost, say, $3 million dollars.

MAPS: And how is Integrated Brand Planning different?

Murali: With Integrated Brand Planning, or what some organizations call the General Manager model, the GM becomes responsible for the profit and loss of a molecule. What this means is that everything becomes visible. Commercial, safety, R&D all becomes visible, because they’re all centered around some level of cost. It forces the organization to align on their priorities and to create targeted strategies.

MAPS: It sounds like you’re talking about a more integrated flow of information between science and business during brand planning?

Murali: Traditionally the separation between science and business was intentional. Many scientists felt, and some may still feel, that science and business need to be separated and if Medical Affairs or Commercial has input to science, it takes away some of the scientific credibility. I like business but I’m a scientist at heart – I want to be measured against the science we engage in, and fortunately the GM model allows us to do both so that I can continue to grow my business acumen as well.

MAPS: What do you mean?

Murali: Let’s say our end goal is innovation – we live longer today because innovation helped us learn to deal with illnesses that would have killed us in our 30s and 40s. And look at the effect of the cholesterol medicine race in the cardiovascular space, heart transplants, etc. or the vaccine industry in general. The biopharmaceutical industry has always struggled to articulate the impact of innovation on society. But combining the business impact and scientific development aspects together, we can now measure and even predict how a therapy is going to provide value, as well as, to understand its economic impact so that we can make better decisions.

MAPS: You’re saying business has a role in innovation?

Murali: Certainly. At a previous position, we hired a top scientist in their field to work with a new molecule. He had great relationships, knew the unmet need, knew what the molecule could do, but he didn’t take into account what other companies were doing, or the needs of payor organizations, or the high level of focus on pricing at that time. When we got ready to introduce the molecule, the potential price and utilization scared the payors – they said it was going to break the healthcare system and that we would need to somehow restrict who is eligible for the therapy, and if we couldn’t do that, possibly no one would get it. Our internal leader couldn’t accept these business realities and the drug was by many measures unsuccessfully launched. For me, that was a very poignant experience. The fact is, you need relationships with scientific leaders, but to run a therapeutic area, you need just as much acumen on the landscape and business side to marry with the scientific aspects to be successful.

MAPS: This sounds like a cautionary tale of science overbalancing business, but of course we have cautionary tales in which business overbalances science as well.

Murali: I believe there are companies out there increasing profitability and cost because they can, but there are also companies trying to do the right thing, and it all gets lumped together. Integrated Brand Planning creates checks and balances.

MAPS: Oh, interesting! And how is that?

Murali: It’s about collaboration at the stage of annual planning. Instead of Commercial proposing studies to R&D, or R&D proposing studies to Commercial, with Integrated Brand Planning, it’s a collaborative, open discussion from the start. Scientists don’t need to also be MBAs and Commercial doesn’t need to hold PhDs, but the dialogue helps scientists elevate their business acumen, and Commercial elevate their scientific acumen. You need the perspective of external stakeholders as well. Most companies will put the patient or a disease at the center of what they do, then you have your organization or company’s resources sitting in the next circle around this center, but there’s an external circle as well that includes: advocacy groups for that therapeutic area, politicians, KOLs in academia, clinicians, etc. This brings the awareness and impact of patient journey and access journey into the planning process.

MAPS: It sounds challenging to help organizations transition from the traditional, siloed way of doing things into this new model of collaboration. What do you do to help generate this?

Murali: Three things. First, I’m trying to educate the scientific organization this can work and not to be afraid, but rather to embrace it. Second, I’m trying to explain what good actually looks like by walking through my own process of evolution from previous experiences at other companies – maybe by seeing how it’s worked elsewhere, we can skip some of the painful learnings. Third, I try to lead by example by sitting in wherever I can as a leader for the Medical organization.

MAPS: With collaboration comes complexity…

Murali: These actions have helped me develop not just as a better leader, but as a better individual. Balancing business and science in this collaborative process of brand planning helps me to not look at things as only black and white. It affects how I approach complex challenges. Sometimes in a discussion, you find out how complex something is and it surprises you through all of the aspects that may need to be considered and planned for. That’s fun for me. How we work together to solve complex problems is fundamentally interesting to me. And when you’re constantly looking at all these variables to make decisions, you get better at it, not just with regard to business decisions, but life decisions as well. When there are things that are hard to pick between, you can use the same mentality to make a well-rounded decision. It might sound strange, but after engaging and leading in this process for so many years, I feel like I ruminate on decisions a lot less, and that I am more secure in my decision-making ability. Don’t get me wrong, it takes effort. You can go through the motions and not get anything out of it. But I dug into it. I really wanted to unpack how far we could take commercial and scientific collaboration and I think it’s facilitated my growth as a leader and attaining this level in my career and in my life.

MAPS Board Chair, Charlotte Kremer: Why The Strategic Rise of Medical Affairs Is Central to Pharma’s Future Success

October 13, 2020/in Competency, Strategy, ACCESS, Overview & Vision, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Content Hub, Content HUB Featured, Leadership & Management Skills, SEARCH BY TOPIC, SEARCH BY TYPE, Medical Strategy & Launch Excellence/by Medical Affairs

It’s no secret that major forces have pushed the pharmaceutical industry to think differently about how it operates and how it can deliver greater value to society. The good news is that we’re seeing more connected, more agile and more outcomes-focused organizations arise from the disruption.

R&D teams have increasingly broken free from traditional scientific silos through increased internal collaboration and external partnerships with biotech and academia. They have embraced transformative science and technological advances and we are starting to see a new generation of medicines forged by our enhanced ability to capture, interpret and apply data.

Our engagement models have also adapted to changing stakeholder needs. More specialty products with more complex data mean that our clinical and access stakeholders are demanding deeper scientific exchanges to understand the patient impact and value to society.

What’s changed in Medical Affairs?

Like many pharma companies, the role of Medical Affairs at Astellas has transformed in recent years, from a support function to a strategic organization to internal and external stakeholders.

Today, Medical Affairs is comprised of the most important and valued capabilities in the business, playing the role of key connector between internal pharma and external stakeholders.

We are driving scientific exchange and evidence generation with an ever-expanding external stakeholder community of healthcare professionals, scientific experts, health authority bodies, payers and patients.

Our role is not just limited to knowing what these stakeholders want and need. We’re fulfilling information needs through data-generation (clinical trials and real-world data analyses), data sharing through publications, medical information and scientific exchange, pinpointing the investments and activities that will drive the biggest impact for each of these groups. The result, ensuring the safety, efficacy, value and real-world utilization of our therapies are fully understood.

As Medical Affairs integrates its wealth of external insights into a consolidated and aligned strategy to guide its own global activities, it also needs to align with Commercial and R&D colleagues. Through governance and operational excellence, Medical Affairs ensures information needs and data are shared across organizations, as and when needed, to enhance the effectiveness and impact of all respective groups.

Leading value creation in the future

As our operating environment has changed, Medical Affairs has become a more business-savvy, scientifically influential, connected and agile function. While we’re making great progress, companies like Astellas know that the disruption won’t stop.

New challenges lie ahead, such as our ability to address wider societal issues and to create value for a variety of stakeholders that is wider than ever before. Another key challenge for us will be the use of artificial intelligence to generate data from combined big data sources, such as clinical health records, real-world data and the variety of ‘omics’ data sets. This information will need to be delivered in an increasingly digitally-savvy way, for example via interactive medical information websites and other digital channels.

We also know that downward pricing pressures are unlikely to go away. We will need to demonstrate how innovations create value to a wider variety of stakeholders than ever before. So, every commercial decision will have greater consequences.

With this mind, I believe that Medical Affairs professionals must continue to build on the range of capabilities that enable them to act as orchestrators of company strategy with R&D and Commercial functions. Central to this is effective leadership. Medical Affairs leaders need to be ready to interact with the C-Suite and inform corporate strategies because it is helping companies to make smarter decisions and focus performance measures on patient-centric outcomes. And that’s value creation that makes a real difference.

8/18/16 10:06:55 AM — Astellas portrait session. Charlotte Kremer © Todd Rosenberg Photography 2016

Charlotte Kremer, M.D.

EVP, Head of Medical Affairs,

Astellas Pharma Inc.

Eileen Sawyer: Big Reader, Science Nerd and Medical Affairs Leader in Gene Therapy

October 6, 2020/in ACCESS, Competency, Strategy, Overview & Vision, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Content Hub, Medical Communications, SEARCH BY TOPIC, SEARCH BY TYPE/by Medical Affairs

Eileen Sawyer didn’t always intend to work in pharma—in fact, she hadn’t ever planned to have a career in science.

Growing up in a Boston suburb, neither of her parents worked in the sciences. Her dad was a computer programmer and her mom edited college textbooks. But the family was always passionate about the natural world. Sawyer recalls spending family vacations at national parks, identifying plants and animals together. She’s a self-proclaimed science nerd. She loves the details and especially translating those details to application. Quality science is where it all begins.

In high school, she says she was a ‘big reader,’ and planned to become a writer. In college, that idea changed when she developed an interest in psychology. She loved learning how people think, and she especially liked studying the connection between psychology and biology.

Eileen Sawyer, Vice President, Global Medical Affairs, UniQure

As part of her studies, Sawyer took an introduction to a neuroscience class—and fell in love with it. She enjoyed combining hard science with an understanding of psychology to discover why people are the way they are. It had a storytelling flavor that appealed to the writer in her.

She started working towards her Bachelor of Arts in Neuroscience, and spent her summers interning in labs that studied animal behaviour. Her new career goal became discovering connections between the brain and behavior that could improve healthcare, and after college, she pursued a PhD in Neuroscience research. She hoped to make scientific advancements that would contribute to development of new drugs to help people.

The Right Fit

However, after her PhD, Sawyer began questioning if academia was the right fit. She continued on to her post-doc but felt frustrated. Their team was doing pre-clinical drug discovery, but there were stacks of studies sitting in file drawers waiting to be published. It was great science, but she longed to work more directly on creating new medicines. After all, she had gotten into science to help people. She realized that more than anything, she wanted to work closer to patients—and have a greater impact on their care.

That’s when she made the leap into pharma. Initially, she started by doing some freelance science writing and editing on the side. But the more she got to know the world of pharma, the more she realized that the best place to have the type of impact she wanted was in one of those companies itself, directly working on bringing new drugs to patients. To open up new opportunities, she tried old fashioned networking—asking people about what they do and reaching out to leaders in the industry. She got involved with associations in medical writing and communications and applied to dozens of jobs.

Months later, she got a call about an editing job. But by that point, she realized she didn’t want to just write—she wanted to work inside pharma. She declined the role and continued networking and applying.

The Call

Eventually, she got the call she was looking for—an interview at Alexion in scientific communications. The team that was hiring was preparing to launch a product for bone disease. The condition was rare, and severe. Babies were born with no mineralization in their bones and died because their chest couldn’t support breathing. Of course, the work was completely different from neuro, as it was all below the neck. Still, Sawyer knew immediately that she wanted to help.

The position at Alexion was a formative experience. Sawyer had a mentor she admired, and a role that allowed for plenty of exposure to all of medical affairs, from launch preparation to strategy. Their team worked in that crucial space between the science and the impacts on actual people. In real time, she got to witness science turning into effective medicine—medicine that made tangible impacts on patients.

She loved every minute of it.

After the drug was launched, Sawyer began looking for her next step, knowing that she wanted to find another role with the same level of impact. She found the perfect answer—working on gene therapy at uniQure.

When Sawyer started at uniQure as Director of Scientific Communications, it was small company with no Medical Affairs department. Six months into her tenure, she became the firm’s first Director of MA, and for the first two years in the role, she was a one-woman department. More recently, she has been able to build out the team and increase their impact.

Now, she leads more than seven people with different MA specialties ranging from communications and field medicine to health economics and strategy.

Removing Barriers

Sawyer’s MA team is focused on removing barriers to access to gene therapy. The barriers for patients fall into two main categories:

Knowledge

The health care provider or the patient either does not understand gene therapy or has misperceptions about it and how it can treat the condition. They may not even know a drug is in development. The answer to this challenge? Education.

Evidence barriers

Justifiably, patients and doctors have questions about the treatment. The MA team needs to work to understand those questions, bring them back inside to find answers, and then take those solutions back to the patients. Sometimes, this process requires supplemental studies or health outcomes research.

Sawyer saw a clear key to removing those barriers—listening to patients and physicians. To ensure they were receiving adequate feedback on their work, Sawyer and her team started early, reaching out to patients and physicians while publishing and announcing results from the phase 1 study.

As it turned out, listening to patients changed the team’s entire development program. From the conversations, they learned that the community wanted something completely different from the gene therapy than was expected. So, they went back to the drawing board, totally changing the design of the program.

Sawyer was responsible for presenting the change to thought leaders, MDs and top patient advocates. When she revealed the news at a small scientific meeting after the company announcement, there was an audible gasp in the room. The leaders didn’t think regulators would permit this type of change. However, when she heard from the community that provided the feedback, Sawyer was reassured that they had made the right decision. Patients and physicians were so pleased to see that the company responded to their comments, and it completely transformed their attitude towards partnering with uniQure.

“Our goal was to deliver what they need,” says Sawyer. “They saw that.”

Patient Input

Now, uniQure has patients provide input into everything from their protocol to their patient materials and scientific steering committees. Again, and again, Sawyer has seen them contribute remarkable insights the MDs hadn’t thought about. She recalls one patient at a steering committee who pointed out an issue with the wording in a particular passage. It mentioned barrier protection during sexual contact, and he asked, “How are you defining sex? How inclusive are you being?” The team used his feedback to rewrite the section with more inclusiveness and clarity.

The uniQure team after defending the switch to AMT-061 at the European Medicine Agency. Sawyer is sixth from right.

“Sometimes, wearing the medical hat you forget to think about how it would play in the real world. What does it really mean for someone’s life?” she says.

Sawyer is making it her life’s work to focus on the patient—the most important stakeholder in drug development. She wants to help them take ownership over their care and make informed decisions. To do that, they need access to information—both directly and via access to educated health care providers. Her team presents scientific findings at patient meetings as well as medical meetings, and they engage with patient association leaders around science and policy. They even involve patients in economics and outcomes research. The goal is to foster true partnerships while developing each drug.

“At the end of the day, it’s about giving the patient control,” Sawyer says. “The best scenario is for a patient to have many options and be empowered to choose the best choice for them. The role of pharma in this setting is to equip them with the tools to make those decisions.”

Throughout her career, she has never lost the desire that drew her to pharma. It’s the desire to turn cool science into medicine and make something that matters—something that will make someone’s life better. For her, a great day is one where she has the chance to talk to a physician and hear a patient story. Learning about the tangible impacts that the science is making on patients is what keeps her coming back.

We had a chance to sit down with Eileen. Enjoy watching our interview to see how she responds to questions about:

How her team partners with patients to provide better options for their care
What leaders can do to keep the fire of purpose burning within their people
What she sees for the future of Medical Affairs

This article is graciously contributed by Excellerate: Patient-Focused Engagement for Pharma.

The Future of Medical Affairs: A Conversation with Beat Sümegi, SVP Medical, Sanofi

October 1, 2020/in Competency, Strategy, Overview & Vision, ACCESS, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Evidence Generation, Content Hub, Medical Communications, SEARCH BY TOPIC, SEARCH BY TYPE/by Medical Affairs

MAPS speaks with Beat Sümegi, SVP Medical with Sanofi, about major areas of change and the need to help Medical Affairs professionals build new skills to succeed in this world of increased responsibility and opportunity.

Interview: The Value of Medical Affairs

June 10, 2020/in Competency, Strategy, Open Access, Value & Impact, Elevate Articles, Leadership & Management Skills, Medical Strategy & Launch Excellence/by Medical Affairs

Joseph Eid, MD, SVP, Head of Global Medical Affairs at Bristol Myers Squibb, describes how Medical Affairs can ensure representation of the patient voice in product development, and the positive shift and elevated prominence Medical Affairs is achieving within companies.

If the video above does not play, or to view full screen, CLICK HERE to open in a new window.

Download the Presentation

Members may also download a PDF copy of Dr. Eid’s panel discussion on The Value of Medical Affairs from the MAPS 2020 Global Annual Meeting as well as a recording of the session in the Community Portal.

View the White Paper

You may also view our latest white paper on the Communicating the Value of Medical Affairs, by clicking here.

Purpose-driven culture: How to make an impact in a value-driven world

October 11, 2019/in Competency, Leadership Models, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Leadership & Management/by Medical Affairs

Executive Vice President & CMO, UCB, Iris Loew-Friedrich discusses the importance of a purpose-driven culture to employee engagement

Caring for people – patients and colleagues – coupled with the science are the twin elements that form the foundation of Professor Doctor Iris Loew-Friedrich’s approach to her role. And this aligns neatly with the vision of her employer, global biopharma company UCB, and provides a platform for collaboration both within and outside the organization.

A physician by training, Professor Loew-Friedrich started her professional life at the Frankfurt University Medical School and has always tried to combine patient care with high-quality research. Today she is Executive Vice-President Development and Medical Practices and Chief Medical Officer at UCB, where she provides global strategic leadership across a range of areas.

“I still very much consider myself a physician, so patient care is really at the center of what drives me – and more generally it’s care for people: people living with diseases and also people in our company, in my organization and people in our industry are what motivates me very much.” This approach chimes with the way UCB articulates its vision: “Inspired by patients. Driven by science.” Professor Loew-Friedrich is confident that this “really sends out a message about who we want to be.”

Culture is a key driver

She explains: “I think culture is the key driver and so creating a culture that gives colleagues a sense of purpose and the opportunity to make a meaningful impact is important. At UCB, we have one central question that we ask all the time: how will what we do make a difference for patients living with severe diseases? It’s the value-creation topic that is at the center of all of our work.”

And, of course, this vision resonates especially within the Medical Affairs function.

“Our mission in Medical Affairs is to drive the continuous modernization and integration of data from multiple disciplines and sources. Then we need to translate them into actionable insights with scientific integrity, efficiency and transparency so that we optimize the patient and healthcare professional experience. That’s a mission behind which we can all align. We try to ensure that all colleagues in our Medical Affairs practice understand how each of them contributes to this mission and we combine this with forming a culture of high-performing teams.

“Everybody is focused on the same purpose of creating value for patients. On top of this, we try to ensure that we are an organization that cultivates learning, innovating and high performance and all of that integrated with opportunities for personal development, recognition, and rewards. It is the entire package that is required to attract the talent for the future and to maintain and develop that talent in our organization.”

Moreover, continuous learning is key to fostering agility and adaptability, according to Professor Loew-Friedrich. “As the environment keeps changing so quickly, the ability of an organization to be agile and to adapt is very important and so these are important traits that we’re looking for when we are hiring talent – a mindset to innovate, to grow, a mindset of continuous learning.”

How can the organization attract this type of talent? “We aim to create the sense of purpose, the sense of belonging, and key opportunities for personal development and growth. In line with our practice thinking, we are trying to establish communities of colleagues who either have the same role in the organization or who work in the same geography or who are engaged around the same patient population. So, our communities are aligned on common themes and we see that as a major driver of identification with the Medical Affairs organization and a source of inspiration and learning.”

Leadership

Leadership for Loew-Friedrich has always been about empowering people to have maximum impact in a team environment. “I consider myself very much as someone who creates opportunities and empowers people. I believe you cannot be a leader without being passionate about what you are doing. Of course, we need to be very objective in our decision-making.”

Asked about the key capabilities to be developed within Medical Affairs as we move towards value-based medicine, Professor Loew-Friedrich is clear: “From my perspective the biggest topic is probably around creating and mastering medical insights. The second area of focus is collaborating very broadly for evidence generation.

“In terms of generating and mastering medical insights, I think we have already plenty of data available but how do we then use the data to truly generate insights? For me, this means that it’s not about just generating outputs and results, but really going one step further and distilling meaningful insights, providing context and ultimately driving impact. “On the second topic – collaboration for evidence generation – I think we have plenty of opportunity to join forces with academia or other institutions outside of our industry to invest our joint resources into the acceleration of the advancement of medical science. If a medicine gets to a patient in its first indication, there is a vast opportunity in terms of further knowledge and insights being generated: how can we get to the best ideas and how can we turn them into a true win-win situation that will create value for patients? This is where I believe we can collaborate closely with academic institutes, patient advocacy groups and other stakeholders to really get to the best possible outcome.”

Professor Loew-Friedrich points out that collaboration will be enhanced by advanced technology. “What I am seeing for the future is that we need to launch artificial intelligence capabilities – so that we use the data to simulate scenarios that will very objectively inform the next steps and ultimately enhance patient care. One of the big topics around collaboration for evidence generation is building on the strengths of human intelligence and artificial intelligence and establishing seamless interaction between both.”

How can we measure our performance in this new world? “Performance management is a topic that we continuously need to evolve and that is not as easy as it sounds. We’re trying to move away from very simple, quantitative measures – number of scientific exchanges, number of publications, impact factors – to measuring the quality of our analytical skills and the insight generation. Getting to meaningful qualitative measures is not an easy task. And I understand it’s not only difficult for UCB, it’s a challenge for the entire industry.”

Finally, the new operating model elevates Medical Affairs from a supportive role into a strategic decision-maker and trusted scientific partner: how is this change manifesting itself within the organization? “We are moving towards an integrated model that provides the Medical team the right space to be a trusted scientific and strategic partner ‘eye-to-eye’. What we need to continue to enhance is leadership and business acumen of our medical colleagues. This is not only about scientific leadership and leadership in insight generation, it’s also leadership in the most classical sense of providing direction, engaging and inspiring colleagues – inside Medical Affairs and beyond. That’s a work in progress and a key competency that we continue to strengthen in the organization.”

Prof. Dr. Iris Loew- Friedrich: Career Path

The Rise and Rise of Medical

April 30, 2019/in Competency, Strategy, Overview & Vision, Open Access, Elevate Articles, Leadership & Management Skills/by Medical Affairs

Can Medical professionals step up to a more strategic role? Dr. Ameet Nathwani discusses the need to define and measure our contribution, and why we must join together as a community to reshape the future of healthcare.

As technology advances inexorably transforming the healthcare landscape, Medical is poised for a more strategic role within pharma – that’s the view of former Chief Medical Officer of Sanofi, Ameet Nathwani. However, nobody with whom he works closely would be surprised to learn that he is not a fan of the term “Medical Affairs”.

“This harks back to an understanding of the way that Medical functions used to work about 15 or 20 years ago, which was much more around supporting the scientific base of the commercial organization. I prefer to just refer to the Medical function as it has evolved and expanded enormously; it’s a much more strategic function now and where it sits in Sanofi, reporting directly to CEO level speaks loudly to the progress made in this regard.”

New dynamics in the healthcare ecosystem

Underpinning this evolution are a series of distinct trends (see Figure 1) including the digital health revolution, the empowerment of the patient, and a requirement for continuous evidence generation. He explains: “It takes seven to eight years to develop a drug and, in that time, the healthcare system, the digital technologies, the innovation available, the way physicians practice, what the expectations of patients are, may have all fundamentally changed. So the question is: is the biologically innovative drug still relevant to patients and the healthcare system at the end of a long development process? And how do we ensure that digital health technology – the superconvergence of mobile, social, biometrics, genomics and AI – is being capitalized in everything we do? We see integrating digital health as a fundamental role of the Medical organization; from building a drugs-plus type of approach, through to real-world evidence is something the Medical function has to master.”

Taking control of RWE

Another driver of Medical’s current transformation is the requirement for continuous evidence generation. This is the melding of Real World Evidence (RWE), digital health, post-approval evidence and patient insight. “At Sanofi, Medical is in charge of the Real-World Evidence platform. We’ve built it and we, in turn, provide a service to R&D, Medical teams and Market and Patient Access. We should be able to move earlier into development, by leveraging the RWE platform for adaptive registration approaches to new products. With a really effective Real-World Evidence platform, good analytics and a transparent network, you could set up a very comprehensive, continuous observational program that continually helps to refine the benefits and risks of our products in real life as well as uncover new indications.”

Nathwani thinks how we maximize RWE will define the Medical function’s strategic value in the future. “We can’t be regarded as a strategic function if we’re not looking at how we can play a relevant role in the rapidly changing healthcare system. So, as a Medical function, we need to understand and define what the future of Medical should be in anticipation of these changes. How do we re-define ourselves? Where do we get our inspiration from – which other parts of the business or which other businesses do we send our medical teams to for inspiration? For example, are some of our Medical teams spending time at the Consumer Electronics Show, where you can pick up signals on future trends and behaviors of consumers in general – how a view of how these trends could be applied to the health sector? At Sanofi, we spend a lot of time engaging with tech companies to try and get a sense of where they are going and brainstorming on how to apply these to health. The main message is that Medical needs to look at what’s happening broadly in the world of technology, analytics, as well as in the traditional areas of medicine and healthcare, and zealously bring some of those ideas back internally to assess if we can integrate them to help us improve outcomes for patients.”

Measurement for Impact

One of the key challenges for Medical involves clarifying its new remit within the organization. Sanofi has selected nine strategic priorities for the function (see Figure 2), which serve as a roadmap for the transformation within the context of the evolving healthcare landscape. For Nathwani, the clarity this provides is a fundamental first step to making the function more value-driven, from early development right through to the end of the product lifecycle.

“There’s been a reluctance to measure the impact of Medical in the past as there wasn’t a clear definition of what it can achieve. We don’t measure return on investment, as commercial metrics don’t apply. We’ve been through this whole exercise of what we could do and what success looks like and how we measure the value that we bring: have we really made an impact on patients and physicians, have we fundamentally changed healthcare systems, have we introduced a drugs-plus solution that has truly improved outcomes? Do physicians regard the information provided by the Medical organization as credible, is the quality of the dialogue good, has it changed behavior? While complex and not easy to measure, these are the performance measures that we are trying to formulate in each pillar of our activities.”

Culture

Much of the work around redefining Medical’s role within the organization goes beyond just structural issues, and there are considerable challenges around culture and changing roles and expectations. “It’s probably the hardest thing to do right now. A first step is having top-down support. Following that, at the grassroots level, is there a clear roadmap or vision, is the platform that we’re trying to build and the vision for Medical truly understood by all stakeholders at all levels, including within the Medical function? There are many individuals in Medical today who have very different experiences and mindsets, some from a time where Medical occupied a more traditional support function role and maybe some of the teams are not fully convinced that we can truly make a difference to the strategic direction of the organization. It’s vital to get the whole organization on board and that comes from having a strong conviction, and a clearly defined roadmap of how to make this happen.”

A key component of a successful transformation will be an expansion of Medical’s capabilities – to allow a company to understand the patient experience, access, and influence a broad array of external healthcare stakeholders, and to act as a liaison between the medical community and the internal research organization.

“We described the required capabilities of the future Medical organization and we are creating the training platforms to accompany that. And we help them to understand the processes by which you transform. It’s not easy at the country level, where the ‘rubber hits the road’, because the pressure of the business and the resources and experience to lead change is much more difficult to obtain. We have taken the long view, so when we hire today, we try to hire for the future. We try to bring in people who have a better understanding of biotechnology, drug development, are strong on analytics and with a solid grounding in medicine, and where possible, a strong interest in the digital side. It’s tough. We also look for people with a very strong patient-centric focus as the energy and passion these individuals bring to our organization is tremendous, and keeps us grounded in our purpose”.

Together is better

With today’s life science industry now under extreme pressure to deliver superior medical outcomes while simultaneously cutting the cost of drug development, the time is right for Medical organizations to earn their place at the leadership table by creating opportunities to deliver new value for both patients and the healthcare ecosystem. Different companies are at different stages of maturity in terms of their progression towards being a fully-fledged strategic partner. However, the lack of a unified voice is hampering progress, Nathwani suggests.

“Our weakness is the heterogeneity of the role that Medical plays across organizations. We have extremes, from Medical as a well-accepted key strategic partner, right through to other organizations where Medical is probably more in the mainly customer support role. That heterogeneity means that it’s very hard to get alignment. If you look at the R&D organizations across industry, there is more clarity around their value and role. The main R&D leaders regularly meet together in a pre-competitive forum to look at the future direction of R&D and discuss macro trends. We don’t systematically do that across the Medical leaders in industry. There are a few useful platforms, but given the heterogeneity of our roles, the discussions are not consistent and our collective influence and voice is not at the level it could be.”

Nathwani is a strong advocate for Medical Affairs coming together as a community to decide on the future direction of MA. “We need to align on what are the key priorities that we believe Medical should be working towards across industry. For example, can we agree what would be a reasonable way to present the value of Medical internally and externally? Can we agree on what are the areas that Medical should try to drive within organizations – be that digital or drugs-plus or lifecycle management, and so on. Can we agree on the optimal methodologies for collecting and using RWE or utilizing advanced analytics for post-registration studies? What’s our approach on the many industry topics around bioethics?

“For example, in our organization, Medical runs the Sanofi Bioethics Committee, which helps to form company-wide positions on fundamental issues such as data transparency, the way we conduct trials, our approach to patient groups, positions on nanotechnologies or genetic therapies. Medical could be much more instrumental on matters like these if we had a platform across industry which could integrate positions from other companies and gain alignment on them. There’s a lot of areas I think that an organization like MAPS could focus on, to really elevate the Medical organization and its voice in our industry.”

Medical has a window of opportunity to become a strategic function. It needs to make itself relevant to the changing healthcare ecosystem and is well-positioned to do so but it could easily “miss the bus” on this if it carries on as is.

The future of the function is very much in our hands, Nathwani believes. “It depends on what we do next. In fact, I think we’re at a tipping point right now. We either prove our innovative value by adapting to and addressing the external changes happening in healthcare and our industry, or we will continue to remain a mainly support function. There’s a lot to do. If we can, for example, use Real World Evidence platforms to fundamentally change the way we carry out drug development, understand patients and diseases, and leverage these to bring through our biologic innovations faster, more safely and at a reduced cost, that to me will be a remarkable achievement.”

Digital Health: The Road Ahead for Medical Affairs

April 20, 2019/in Competency, Open Access, Customer Engagement & Scientific Comms, Digital Trends & Opportunities, Elevate Articles, Leadership & Management Skills/by Medical Affairs

As real-world data and advanced analytics start to transform life sciences, Medical Affairs is transitioning to a new strategic role. However, grasping this opportunity requires a significant mindset shift, and MA professionals will need to acquire a new skillset.

The amount of data we are currently generating is astronomical. According to one often-quoted article on Forbes.com, some 90 percent of the data in the world was generated over the past two years alone. [1]

Today’s world is defined by data, with 2.5 quintillion bytes of data created everyday – and that pace is only accelerating as the Internet of Things (IoT) expands. No surprise then that Mike Devoy, Chief Medical Officer, Head of Medical Affairs & Pharmacovigilance at Bayer, predicts that the time is right for digital to transform our thinking about healthcare.

“I believe digital is going to become more and more important and, over time, it will transform how healthcare is delivered and also how drugs are researched and discovered. We’ve seen the explosion in data coming from the intensified use of wearable devices, sensors and so on, but now we have the computer power and the technology to start to really understand that information and turn it into relevant action.”

Moreover, Medical Affairs stands at the very epicenter of this digital revolution in healthcare, given the function’s scientific credentials and its potential to define, gather and interpret data to generate the insights that will deliver meaningful outcomes for the entire spectrum of healthcare stakeholders – but especially patients and healthcare professionals.

Sources:1: Bernard Marr, “How Much Data Do We Create Every Day? The Mind-Blowing Stats Everyone Should Read,” Forbes, May 21, 2018, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/21/how-much-data-do-we-create-every-day-the-mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/#228be95b60ba.

Unique role

“In Medical Affairs, we have a unique role because we have a deep understanding of our products and knowledge of diseases. We should be looking to fit the new knowledge and insights that we can collect from Real-World Evidence (RWE) into delivering even better solutions for patients and the healthcare system. And, because we are in daily contact with healthcare professionals, patient associations and other stakeholders, we should be the ones who play a critical role in transforming that into something that actually meets the needs and provides services and solutions for end-users. By connecting what’s coming out of our R&D, the strategy behind the products from a commercial point of view, we could build this into an overall, integrated patient care vision.”

Top three areas of focus

Dr Devoy sees scope for applying digital innovation across a range of areas but suggests that R&D, patient outcomes, and safety are the three to focus on initially. There is significant potential for how we conduct clinical trials: for example, using artificial intelligence (AI) within R&D as part of the drug discovery process, and also helping to better characterize and stratify disease and the according patient populations for study.

“If you look at a disease such as heart failure, we still have a pretty simple way of categorizing patients based on clinical examination, imaging investigation and some clinical tests. But almost certainly there are more different types of heart failure in terms of the underlying pathophysiology. So, if we can apply digital learning and artificial intelligence to better stratify these areas and therefore to personalize treatments, then I think we will overcome a lot of hurdles to improving patient care.”

Cost is already a major issue in healthcare and digital has the potential to help unlock cost-savings for healthcare systems and wider society, as well as for industry.

Digitally integrating electronic medical records (EMR), both to identify patients and then also to follow up and stay connected with them is another considerable area of potential.

“I think there are already examples starting to happen that could dramatically reduce the cost of particularly large outcome studies which you have to do in areas like cardiovascular. There are significant gains that can be achieved by applying technology to make the studies more efficient, more precise, simpler to conduct, and so able to be conducted more quickly and more cheaply.”

Digitally integrating electronic medical records (EMR), both to identify patients and then also to follow up and stay connected with them is another considerable area of potential. “We should be looking at diagnostic technology and EMR to detect and diagnose disease much earlier and enable informed decision-making – that will allow us to intervene with prevention before people become physically sick at the stage they might currently be diagnosed.”

Adherence and product safety are two further areas of great promise for digital.

“For as long as I’ve been in the industry, something we’ve talked about but struggled with is finding ways that we can help patients adhere to the treatment that they’ve been prescribed, so that we actually deliver better outcomes. The use of sensors, wearables and other applications may offer such a solution for enhancing treatment adherence. I also believe that we can help better understand the benefit-risk of our products using AI and big data approaches to identify safety signals and issues with products earlier.”

Challenges

However, the fact that the technology is so new and accompanied by such a weight of expectation inevitably implies some formidable challenges.

“We read every day about how digital is transforming everything we do – be that personal finance, or interactions with retail – so I think the expectation from society is that healthcare will also transform in that way. But, clearly, healthcare has quite rightly some additional challenges relating to the sensitivity of people’s health data and taking the right care of that. So, we need to work with regulators, governments, patients and physicians to make sure that these solutions are accessible, trusted, compliant and fitted to people’s expectations.

As companies, we need to adapt to working and developing and being successful in a digital environment. So, that will mean hiring and developing new talent with the right skills in areas like data science and data privacy. But, also, we are not just competing with other healthcare companies, now, but numerous other technology companies and other industries for those skill sets. It’s not just hiring new people, but also developing capabilities, making our current employees more savvy about working with digital – how those technologies could be applied, what the potential options are.

One area where Medical Affairs in most companies is usually taking a lead is understanding, communicating and generating real-world evidence. That is going to put increasing demands on Medical Affairs organizations to be able to access and analyze large data sets. To turn this into useful and meaningful evidence that can inform both the decisions of our organizations but also inform other stakeholders such as regulators, physicians and patients.”

New digital culture

At Bayer, digital is already driving new business models and the organization is cultivating a new digital culture across its various businesses. “Digital will change our business models and how we relate to patients and healthcare professionals – it’s a high priority for us and we have created a strategic framework as well as a digital agenda to help us become future-ready. We really want to make digital technologies an integral part of our overall business acumen, value chain, lifecycle management and decision-making, and we’re looking at that as a critical aspect of our overall business. We also recognise that a lot of the innovation and expertise is going to come from outside and from different areas, from different sorts of companies.

“One thing I believe we’ve done very successfully is build up an approach for actively seeking external collaboration. ”Among the initiatives is a global program called Grants4Apps, established in 2013, where Bayer reaches out to companies that are in the early stages of developing in the digital health and care space. Bayer acts as incubator and offers mentoring support and access to Bayer expertise and knowledge to help them develop their business models and solutions. Meanwhile, the Grants4Apps Dealmaker program is a unique opportunity to acquire Bayer as a customer and is tailored for mature teams, startups and companies that have a solution ready to go for identified challenges.

We also partner with research institutions across the world and, where it makes sense, with various technology companies that are also entering the healthcare space. You look at who are the partners that are meaningful to your stakeholders – like patients and healthcare professionals – and how do you do something with that partner that creates more value. We strive to enhance our ecosystem (for example with subsidiaries in San Francisco and Boston) and constantly monitor the external environment trying to link business challenges and evidence needs to potential technological solutions.”

Quality and quantity of data

Nevertheless, to harness the potential of RWE – both from EMR and sensors and devices – companies such as Bayer will need to make sure they have the ability to handle large volumes of data, that the data is of the right quality and data privacy is respected, and that they have the right skills and methodological approach to succeed in this space. “I think we need to make sure that we operate to a high standard of scientific integrity and quality because there are certainly risks if you don’t. And you need to bring in different skill sets in areas that will allow you to collect, analyse and interpret that data.” Bayer has been working hard to find people with skills in areas of big data analysis, including data scientists and epidemiologists.

Strategic role

In conclusion, Dr Devoy emphasizes that all of these changes imply a significant mindset shift on the part of MA professionals, who will be moving from their traditional support role to much more of a strategic focus. This will involve the function engaging much earlier in the value chain.

“Medical Affairs will get involved in the early project discussions [helping] research colleagues think about the best approach in terms of patient target groups, disease, models, linking to external expertise and knowledge. He also envisages Medical building a strategy aligned with global and key countries where the function will conceive or build a medical strategy aligned with the overall plan, both in terms of data generation and communication.

“In some key topics, such as real-world evidence, Medical is very much the function that takes the lead role in working with all the internal and external stakeholders to create the strategy and then execute it across the organization. You see it in very tangible things in terms of resource deployment, which has changed very significantly over the last five years.”

Going forward, Dr Devoy sees Medical as being the trusted partner between businesses and key external stakeholders – patient bodies, physicians and regulators – articulating the value companies are providing to healthcare systems and to patients. MA potentially has a unique understanding of how that value can be created and delivered, and a key role in developing the evidence and solutions around that value in collaboration with internal and external partners such as R&D colleagues, digital providers, physician groups and patient advocates.

“As patients become more empowered to make healthcare choices, it’s more important than ever for healthcare companies to create compelling and satisfying experiences. Digital solutions and innovation have never been more at the forefront of healthcare and are an important part of Bayer’s long-term strategy. These solutions can drive down costs or boost efficiency, build connections to patients and dramatically improve patient outcomes.”

About

Dr Michael Devoy is the Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance for the Pharmaceuticals Division at Bayer AG. He is also the Chief Medical Officer of Bayer AG. He joined the former Schering AG in 2005 as Senior Vice President of Global Medical Development and was appointed to his current position in 2014.

Dr Devoy studied Medicine and Pharmacology at University College London and graduated with a Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (MB, BS). He is a member of the Royal College of Physicians in London. He has extensive experience across Clinical Development and International Medical Affairs. His career in the pharmaceutical industry began when he joined Glaxo Group Research in Clinical Pharmacology.

Leadership Lessons

“Probably the most important leadership experience came in my early career, when I became a Medical Director of a country – in that case Australia – where I had to operate with a greater degree of independence, lead quite a large team at the time, and balance all the diverse demands of the different stakeholders that interact with you: patients, physicians, researchers, regulators and internal colleagues in the business. I learned a great deal there about my leadership style: what my values were and what my drivers were, particularly through facing difficult issues and talking, reflecting on what we were trying to achieve; why and how you’re going to do that; and staying true to yourself in managing through those difficult topics.

“In terms of the sums, we had some financial challenges. I had to find a way of making my organization more efficient and responsive, and that was an important – and also, at the time – difficult experience. I then took on more senior global roles and an important step there (which I think applies to a lot of leaders in pharma and Medical Affairs) is managing globally dispersed teams with colleagues in lots of different time zones and countries. This involved balancing people with different cultural expectations, different perspectives on what good leadership looks like and how things should be communicated, how things should be managed, and managing and leading in that set-up.

“I’ve learned something from every leader I’ve had, in terms of how I’ve evolved and grown. In my leadership approach, one important learning I had with a leader was when one day I went to ask if I could do something and they said: ‘You should not be coming to ask my permission.

Come when you need my forgiveness.’ That was at a relatively early stage in my career and I think that gave me a perspective to take more personal responsibility and accountability for addressing situations and finding solutions. Not that it always went to plan, so I think then you accept you also have to take the responsibility for your decisions.

“Also, I had the privilege to work with leaders who modeled the best behaviors in terms of what ultimately is our priority in this industry, which is ensuring that the patients we serve receive the best treatments and optimum care and that we make sure that the trust they put in us as pharmaceutical healthcare companies is fulfilled. I would say that I learned equally from leaders who came from the commercial side of pharma and those who came from a scientific and medical side – all those different individuals have brought aspects to how my style of leadership has evolved.

“You don’t need to be the friend of your leader but, it’s important that you respect and understand their roles and actions and that they understand what you’re doing and how you’re doing it and what your vision is, and how that fits with the overall bigger picture.”